Comments for Talk Is Cheap

Comment on Wut iz zat? by BlueXIII

BlueXIII — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:44:28 +0000

So easy, yet you clowns can’t figure it out. OK, not so easy…

Scott — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:53:15 +0000

No, there’s no more of the pic sent to me.. yet. So I’m guessing too the only hint we have is the “flopping around” part. I’m stumped.

Pete — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:02:52 +0000

Guess I missed the hint… was it supposed to be “flopping around”? Is there even more to be seen of the pic?

Jason — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:28:16 +0000

Abso-freakin-lootly! #1 is right on the money!

BlueXIII — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:32:10 +0000

I guess the hint still didn’t suffice then.

Pete — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:39:24 +0000

So, how many lame answers must we give before we get to see more of the pic? As Jimmy Durante would say, “I’ve got a million of ‘em!”

BlueXIII — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:31:26 +0000

Nice answer Pete…still, no. I knew you all would be flopping around with this one.

Pete — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:24:10 +0000

An early prototype of the lens cover for the bat signal (image upside down just to confuse us, of course)?

BlueXIII — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:46:22 +0000

Nice guess Pete…but still…negative. And another Uh uh for you, Scott.

Scott — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:04:48 +0000

An upside down picture of coach McGuirk’s legs? No? hmm.. still at a loss.